An
objective and impartial estimation of Jane Austen’s contribution to the
development of the English novel involve comparisons which are, also,
likely to undermine her self-imposed limitations as an artist.
Austen’s
range is very narrow. The plots revolve around three or four families
in the countryside, consisting mostly of a few typed characters. There
is only one theme – the theme of love and marriage – repeated in every
novel. Deep philosophy of life is conspicuously absent and there are no
hidden meanings to be discovered. There are no adventures to thrill, no
violent passions to ruffle, no sensations to tickle and tease. Yet she
is one of our major novelists. Safely emerging through two centuries and
severe criticism, today she enjoys secure reputation.
Austen’s
first important achievement is to bring to the English novel dramatic
plots. She has the genius of a great dramatist. Baker successfully
verified the plot of “Pride and Prejudice”, in its various stages of
development, to the pattern of a five-act play. The unity of purposes,
the complete inter-dependence of the main plot and the sub-plots, the
perfect association of the action and the characters, dramatic irony and
short, engaging dialogues render her plots highly dramatic. To
this may be added the objectivity of narration, the complete withdrawal
of the creator from the creation, for she hardly speak in her own
person to give a direct comment.
Jane Austen has given us a multitude of characters. All of them are commonplace such as we meet everybody.
Yet they are al perfectly discriminated from each other as if they were the most eccentric of human beings.
Remarkably,
no two villains are alike, nor two fools for even the greatest
novelists are guilty of repetition. However, her real achievement in
characterization is the ironic exposition of the ‘follies and nonsense,
whims and inconsistencies’ of human conduct. She excels in the depiction
of the ridiculous and of the hiatus between a reality and an
appearance, between a purpose and a pretence that amuses and entertains,
but also perplexes and exasperates.
Another
of her important preoccupations is the theme of self-education. Her
protagonists are often self-deceived. They undergo a painful process of
self-discovery but they have the humility and honesty to admit their
earlier illusionment and the courage to give a new direction to their
life.
Austen
represents feminization of the English novels. She draws her men as
they appear to women and not to men. Her Darcy and Bingley, Knightly and
Frank Churchill are seen through the eyes of her women, Elizabeth, Jane
and Emma. The men never appear alone; they are always in the company of
women, engaged in such activities as women can participate in – balls,
dinners, card sessions, or just walks. This accounts for the lack of
masculinity in her novels. It imposes a serious limitation on her art as
a novelist, but it need not be regretted; we praise it for its rarity.
The
artistic excellence of Austen’s novels deserves high praise. The plots
are contrived and executed with consummate skill. There are no
digressions and no loose ends are left dangling. Among her characters,
there are hardly any superfluous. The dialogues are natural, yet lively,
they help in the development of plot as well as the evolution of
character. Her style is balanced, even epigrammatic. Ruben A. Brower
thinks that many pages of “Pride and Prejudice” can be read a sheer
poetry of wit. Sir Walter Scott concedes that though her subjects are
not often elegant and certainly never grand, they are finished up to
Nature and with a precision. He further says:
The young lady had a talent for describing the involvements, feelings and characters are ordinary life … but the exquisite touch which renders commonplace things and characters interesting from the worth of the depiction and the sentiment is denied to me.
Jane
Austen has often been called a pure novelist for her art is only for
art’s sake and is a source of great aesthetic pleasure on account of its
artistic exquisiteness. Besides, it is also the vehicle of her moral
vision that being based on common sense is pretty sound. A. J. Wright
comments:
Working with materials extremely limited in themselves, she develops themes of the broadest significance; the novels go beyond social record, beneath the didactic, to moral concern, perplexity and commitment.
At
one level, her novels present an authentic record of the life of the
upper middle classes in Southern England at the end of the eighteenth
century, while at another level, her novels can be considered as broad
allegories. “Pride and Prejudice” displays and illustrates the dangers
of excessive Pride and overweening Prejudice. “Sense and Sensibility”
vindicates Sense and exposes the dangers of Sensibility. Emma deals with
self-deception. “Persuasions” describes the dangers of over-persuasion.
Her
most important contribution to the English novels is her ironic world
view. This view lies in the recognition of the fact that man is
confronted with the choice of two things that are mutually exclusive.
The two are equally attractive, equally desirable, but ironically,
incompatible. Sense may be more desirable but Sensibility too is not
without attraction or desirability and its claims. The irony is that the
claims of “Sense and Sensibility” are conflicting.
Ironically,
the theme of “Pride and Prejudice” is the contrast between Intricacy
and Simplicity. Both the qualities have their own attractions and
dangers in them. Darcy and Elizabeth are intricate and attractive but
they are prone to the dangers that accompany such an intricacy. Jane and
Bingley are simple, and they are free from such dangers but they are
dull and lifeless. Perhaps one would like to be simple and intricate all
at once, but that is not possible; which is the irony. Jane Austen
projects this ironic world view practically in all her novels.
Post a Comment